Electronic Scientific Paper Archive

Capture of ungulates in Central Asia using drive nets: advantages and pitfalls illustrated by the Endangered Mongolian saiga Saiga tatarica mongolica

Joel Berger, Kim M. Murray, Bayarbaatar Buuveibaatar, Michael R. Dunbar and Badamjav Lkhagvasuren

Abstract

The study of mammals suffering intense poaching in remote areas poses an increasingly difficult conservation
challenge, in part because the extreme flightiness of such species complicates safe capture. The benefits of
handling (an opportunity to obtain biological information and attach radio collars) must be weighed against stress
to the animals and potential capture-related mortality. In parts of Central Asia this problem is not trivial, as
populations have been heavily harvested and opportunities for restraint are often limited. Mongolian saiga Saiga
tatarica mongolica, being both Endangered and poached, typifies these issues. Here we describe capture protocols for
adult females handled quickly and without anaesthesia. Using multiple vehicles driven at high speed, individual
saiga were isolated from groups and herded into nets. Chase time was linearly associated with rectal temperature
(P,0.03), with maximum pursuits and temperatures of 9 minutes and 43.1C, respectively; time to release averaged
,7 minutes. Given that rural residents often chase saiga and other desert and steppe-dwelling ungulates, for
photography or for amusement, our results offer conservationists and government officials an empirical basis for
recommending prudence on chase times and/or for recommending that the practice be prevented.

Keyword: Body temperature,capture methodology,drive nets,Endangered species,Mongolia,Saiga tatarica mongolica

Introduction

One of today’s many conservation challenges is understanding how best to resolve threats to wild
mammals. Where in situ conservation is a priority, capture for the deployment of radio-collars facilitates collection of
information about demography, movements and habitats (Delgiudice et al., 2001; Kock et al., 2006). In a few cases
threatened species have also been chemically restrained by ground-darting; for example, bactrian camels Camelus bactrianus
and khulans Equus hemionus (Kaczensky et al., 2006; Walzer et al., 2008). However, the capture of Central Asia’s
typically small or fleet ungulates (Przewalski’s Procapra przewalski and Mongolian Procapra gutturosa gazelles, blue
sheep Pseudois nayaur, ibex Capra ibex, saiga Saiga tatarica and chiru Patholops hodgsoni) has been problematic because
of the unavailability of helicopters for darting from the air and because chemical restraint on the ground has not proved feasible.
Remoteness, national security concerns about aircraft, and practical issues of census methodology have hindered
the establishment of effective monitoring and conservation programmes for these species (Schaller, 1998b; Reading
et al., 1998, 1999; Milner-Gulland, 2009). Saiga are illustrative. Formerly widespread across Central Asian steppes and
deserts (Bekenov et al., 1998), the species experienced one of the most tragic declines of a large mammal in the 20th century,
from .1 million individuals to c. 55,000 in ,20 years (Milner-Gulland et al., 2001). While current efforts focus
on the more abundant Critically Endangered S. t. tartarica subspecies (Mallon, 2008b) far less is known about the status
of the Endangered Mongolian subspecies S. t. mongolica (Mallon, 2008a; Young et al., 2010).
Hitherto, there has been no established capture methodology for many of Central Asia’s ungulates, including
adult saiga. As a consequence it has been difficult to deploy radio collars, a tool useful to garner insights about movements
across large landscapes (Ito et al., 2005). We now know, for instance, that species such as Mongolian gazelles
and khulan have spatial requirements of 100,000 km2 or more (Kaczensky et al., 2006; Mueller et al., 2008). For
saiga, however, as well as for other antelopes, the lack of capture protocols has limited the collection of biological
information needed for conservation planning. Additionally, there has been little basis to predict how the chasing of
animals by vehicle, for capture and radio-collaring, affects their performance, an issue of concern (Wildlife Conservation
Society, 2008). To enhance saiga conservation by understanding finescaled movements and potential impediments to migration
(Berger et al. 2008a,b), we elected to radio-collar adult females. Here we present capture and handling methods,
descriptions that we believe are important for two reasons. Firstly, although interest in saiga conservation and restoration
has grown rapidly throughout Central Asia, as evidenced by support from the Convention on Migratory
Species and at numerous workshops, little information is available to practitioners interested in handling techniques.
Secondly, although intense vehicle pursuit remains a standard practice for gaining close-up views of desert and
steppe ungulates, neither short- nor long-term effects are known, although prolonged chases in other species cause
trauma, stress, disruption of social groups and hyperthermia (Kock et al., 2006).
Our studies focus on saiga in and adjacent to the 286,900 ha Sharga Nature Reserve at the foot of the Altai Mountains
(Gov-Altai Aimag) in Western Mongolia. As a result of harassment and poaching, saiga are highly vigilant, regularly
initiating flight at distances of .1.5 km. Like many ungulates under extreme harvest pressure (Lhagvasuren &
Milner-Gulland, 1997; Reading et al., 1998), close approach is impossible and occurs only after high-speed chases over
long distances. Hence, we used drive nets to facilitate capture, as previously used forMongolian gazelles (K. Olson,
pers. comm.) and argali Ovis ammon (Kenny et al., 2008). Biological variation among gazelles, argali, and saiga
necessitates differing capture techniques. Argali, for instance, can jump nets, whereas gazelles occur in groups that
can number in the thousands (Olson et al., 2009). In contrast, Mongolian saiga are generally found in small
groups consisting of ,15 animals and have not been observed to leap over objects.
During 6–14 September 2006 we captured saiga by erecting 400 m of woven nylon nets, approximately 3–4
mm thick, with a mesh size of 10 3 10 cm, across a lowlying area between adjacent hills that served as a natural
travel or escape route for saiga (Plate 1). One person remained hidden at each end of the net as three vehicles
searched for saiga. To minimize pursuit distance, a chase was initiated only if saiga were detected within c. 5 km of
the net. Once spotted, animals were herded by vehicle across the roadless landscape toward the concealed net.
Vehicle speeds reached 100 km h-1; however, we judged that the saiga did not run in excess of 65–70 km h-1. Captures
were during early morning or evening; one midday handling event occurred when skies were overcast. Ambient temperatures
during all captures were 10–16 C. Upon disentanglement from nets (Plate 1), saiga were blindfolded and restrained by hand.
Adult females were fitted with geographical positioning system (GPS; Advanced Telemetry Systems, Isanti, Minnesota, USA) or
satellite (Telonics, Mesa, Arizona, USA) collars, checked for evidence of lactation, weighed in a light net and
released. Collars were equipped with 8-hour mortality sensors and drop-off mechanisms programmed to release
the following summer. Given uncertainty regarding saiga response to handling, their Endangered status, and our desire
to release animals as quickly as possible, we elected not to use anaesthesia or tranquilizers, a practice previously
employed for the safe capture of pronghorn Antilocapra americana and other ungulates (Berger et al., 2006).
We recorded chase duration (time between first detected evasive movements until contact with the net), handling
time (from initial contact with the net until release), and rectal temperature (at first capture). To determine survival
rates, we monitored collared saiga using handheld telemetry equipment for 11 months, until collars released or
mortality was confirmed. Nine of 22 chases yielded successful captures. Median group size when spotted was seven, and we usually
tried to isolate 2–3 females and drive them towards the net. The maximum group size of netted saiga was seven. Of our 13
unsuccessful chases, failures occurred because saiga reversed course and could not easily be redirected toward the
net, animals outdistanced us over rocky terrain, or we halted the chase because chase times or distances were
becoming excessive. A total of 13 saiga (two adult males, nine adult females and two calves) were captured; only adult
females (n 5 8) were radio-collared. In addition, one calf was restrained for several minutes so that she could be released simultaneously
with her mother. Mean handling time was 6.6 – SD 2.5 minutes (n59, range 3–11), mean chase time 6.10 – SD 2.5 minutes (range 3–9)
and mean body mass of adults 23.4 – SD 2.93 kg (n54, range 20.0–27.0). Chase time and rectal temperature were linearly associated (Fig. 1),
although the point at which this relationship breaks down or putatively asymptotes is uncertain.

PLATE 1 Netting, capture and release of saiga Saiga tatarica mongolica in Western Mongolia.
Of the eight collared adults we determined the fates of six. Because two satellite collars failed to transmit locations,
we know nothing about the survival of these individuals. Of the remaining six GPS-collared females, one collar was
discovered more than 20 km from the capture site 18 days post-capture. Cause of death could not be determined
because no carcass was found; however, this animal’s chase time (8 minutes) and body temperature (42.1C) were lower
than that for other captured animals that survived (Fig. 1).

FIG. 1 Relationship between rectal temperature and chase time of female saiga based on empirical measures (dark line) and
hypothetical relationships for longer chase times (dotted lines). Equation of the line is Y 5 0.3508x + 39.37 (r2 5 0.7412, P,0.03).


The second animal was captured on 7 September, and perished on 16 October from an apparent eagle attack. The remaining saiga all survived for at least 11 months. The risk of capture myopathy has been well established (Sargeant et al., 1994; Delgiudice et al., 2001). That we
identified a strong relationship between chase time and body temperature (Fig. 1) is evidence of pursuit-induced
hyperthermia. We do not know, however, at what point saiga may be unable to recover or when body temperatures
will no longer increase. Had our sample been larger or vehicle pursuits longer, rectal temperature would probably
have become asymptotic or extended in a linear fashion. We cannot distinguish between these possibilities. It is
possible that Mongolian saiga, as a desert-adapted species, may be resilient to long chases. However, we do not
advocate longer chases to determine whether an asymptote occurs. Instead, we suggest as a rule of thumb that chases be
limited to ,6–7 minutes, at least until more is known of physiological effects. While the resting body temperature of
S. t. mongolica is unknown, for other species body temperatures are lower than those we detected from pursuit, and exercise-induced
stress can lead to death. For instance, body temperatures of non-disturbed mule deer Odocoileus hemionus are 37.5–39.7C
(Sargeant et al., 1994), and for white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus body temperatures.39.4C
are considered stressful and cooling is recommended (DelGiuduce et al., 2001). In argali drive netting produced
average body temperatures of 40.8C without mortality (Kenny et al., 2008) but the practice also carries great risk;
for roe deer it resulted in death from acute myopathy and myoglobinaemic nephrosis (Montane et al., 2002).
Our findings for saiga are important for two reasons. Firstly, they illustrate a simple methodology by which wild
adult antelopes of open habitats can be successfully captured for scientific research (if chase times are limited).
Secondly, they point to the potential danger of chaseinduced hyperthermia. We suggest that chase times can be
used as a proxy for heat-related stress. Given that rural residents often chase saiga and other desert and steppedwelling
ungulates, for photography or for amusement, our results offer conservationists and government officials an
empirical basis for recommending prudence on chase times and/or for recommending that the practice be prevented.
While enforcement of such policy may not realistically be achievable, our results have been communicated to government
officials, wildlife managers, law enforcement rangers, scientists, herders and the local public within the
range of Mongolian saiga. Our findings on the possible hazards of long chases have been voiced at multi-stakeholder
workshops (Wildlife Conservation Society, 2008), and are now being implemented into local planning. As other
governments in Central Asia seek to enhance ungulate conservation, the methodology we employed merits consideration.
The method also carries a social liability, however. If researchers can pursue animals from vehicles for captures,
then some residents may believe ‘safe’ chase times are acceptable.

Conclusion

Acknowledgements
We thank the National Geographic Society, Trust for Mutual Understanding, Mongolian Academy of Sciences,
Ministry of Nature, Environment and Tourism, USDAAPHIS- National Wildlife Research Center, the Denver Zoo
and the Wildlife Conservation Society. A. Fine, Chi-Unen, J. Hilty, W. Karesh, R. Reading, W.A. Weber and P. Zahler
facilitated this project. K. Socie, J. Young, E.J. Milner- Gulland and several anonymous reviewers provided helpful
comments.

Acknowledgement

none

Reference

ANDREWS, R.C. (1933) The Mongolian wild ass. Natural History, 33, 3–16.
BEKENOV, A.B., GRACHEV, Y.A. & MI LNER-GULLAND, E.J. (1998) The ecology and management of the saiga antelope in Kazakhstan. Mammal Review, 28, 1–52.
BERGER, J., CAIN, S.L. & BERGER, K. (2006) Connecting the dots: an invariant migration corridor links the Holocene to the present.
Biology Letters, 2, 528–531.
BERGER, J., BERGER, K., BERGEN, S., BAYARBAATAR, B., FINE, A., LKHAGVASUREN, B. et al. (2008a) Migration bottlenecks, climate, and the conservation of Pleistocene relicts in central Asia. Open Conservation Biology Journal, 2, 9–10.
BERGER, J., YOUNG, J.K. & BERGER, K.M. (2008b) Protecting migration corridors: challenges and optimism for Mongolian
saiga. PLoS Biology, 6, 166–168.
DELGIUDICE, G.D., MANGIPANE, B.A., SAMPSON, B. & KOCHANNY, C.O. (2001) Chemical immobilization, body temperature,
and post-release mortality of white-tailed deer captured by Clover trap and net-gun. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29, 1147–1157.
ITO, T.Y., MIURA, N., LHAGVASUREN, B., ENKHBILEG, D., TAKATSUKI , S., TSUNEKAWA, A. & JIANG, Z.W. (2005) Preliminary
evidence of a barrier effect of a railroad on the migration of Mongolian gazelles. Conservation Biology, 19, 945–948.
KACZENSKY, P., SHEEHY, D.P., WALZER, C., JOHNSON, D.E., LHKAGVASUREN, D. & SHEEHY, C.M. (2006) Room to Roam? The
Threat to Khulan (Wild Ass) from Human Intrusion. Mongolia Discussion Papers, East Asia and Pacific Environment and Social Development Department, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
KENNY, D., DENICOLA, A., AMGALANBAATAR, S., NAMSHIR, Z., WINGARD, G. & READING, R. (2008) Successful field capture techniques for free-ranging argali sheep (Ovis ammon) in Mongolia. Zoo Biology, 27, 137–144
KOCK, M.D., MELTZER, D. & BURROUGHS, R. (eds) (2006) Chemical and Physical Restraint of Wild Animals. IWVS, Greyton, South Africa.
LHAGVASUREN, B. &MI LNER-GULLAND, E.J. (1997) The status and management of the Mongolian gazelle (Procapra gutturosa)
population. Oryx, 31, 127–134.
MALLON, D.P. (2008a) Saiga tatarica ssp. mongolica. In IUCN Red List of Threatened Species v. 2009.2. Http://www.iucnredlist.org [accessed 4 February 2010].
MALLON, D.P. (2008b) Saiga tatarica ssp. tatarica. In IUCN Red List of Threatened Species v. 2009.2. Http://www.iucnredlist.org [accessed
4 February 2010].
MI LNER-GULLAND, E.J. (2009) Challenges and prospects for applied ecology in China. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 509–510.
MI LNER-GULLAND, E.J., KHOLODOVA, M.V., BEKENOV, A., BUKREEVA, O.M. & GRACHEV, I.A. (2001) Dramatic decline in
saiga populations. Oryx, 35, 340–345.
MONTANE, J., MARCO, I., MANTECA, X., LOPEZ, J. & LAVIN, S. (2002) Delayed acute capture myopathy in three roe deer. Journal
of Veterinary Medicine Series A, 49, 93–98.
MUELLER, T., OLSON, K.A., FULLER, T.K., SCHALLER, G.B., MURRAY, M.G. & LEIMGRUBER, P. (2008) In search of forage:
predicting dynamic habitats of Mongolian gazelles using satellite based estimates of vegetation productivity. Journal of Applied
Ecology, 45, 649–658.
OLSON, K.A., MUELLER, T., BOLORTSETSEG, S., LE IMGRUBER, P., FAGAN, W.F. & FULLER, T.K. (2009) A mega-herd of more than
200,000 Mongolian gazelles Procapra gutturosa: a consequence of habitat quality. Oryx, 43, 149–153.
READING, R.P., MIX, H., LHAGVASUREN, B. & BLUMER, E.S. (1999) Status of wild Bactrian camels and other large ungulates in southwestern
Mongolia. Oryx, 33, 247–255.
READING, R.P., MIX, H., LHAGVASUREN, B. & TSEVEENMYADAG, D. (1998) The commercial harvest of wildlife in Dornod Aimag,
Mongolia. Journal of Wildlife Management, 62, 59–71.
SCHALLER, G.B. (1998a) Mongolia’s golden horde: a million migrating gazelles. Wildlife Conservation, November/December, 36–41.
SCHALLER, G. B. (1998b) Wildlife of the Tibetan Steppe. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
SARGEANT, G.A., EBERHARDT, L.E. & PEEK, J.M. (1994) Thermoregulation by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in arid rangelands
of south-central Washington. Journal of Mammalogy, 75, 536–544.
WALZER, C., KACZENSKY, P., GANBAATAR, O., LENGGER, J., ENKHSAIKHAN, N. & LKHAGVASUREN, D. (2008) Capture and anaesthesia of wild Mongolian equids—the Przewalski’s horse (E. ferus przewalskii) and khulan (E. hemionus). Mongolian Journal of Biological Sciences, 4, 4–13.
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY (2008) Mongolian saiga conservation workshop. Oryx, 42, 14–15.
YOUNG, J.K., MURRAY, K.M., STRINDBERG, S., BUUVEIBAATAR, B. & BERGER, J. (2010) Population estimates of Mongolian saiga:
implications for effective monitoring and population recovery. Oryx, 44, 285–292.

Biographical sketches
JOEL BERGER focuses on how best to move science into practical conservation. KIM MURRAY concentrates on population monitoring
and assessment to enhance conservation. BAYARBAATAR BUUVEIBAATAR has worked with gazelles, saiga, bears and small
mammals to improve the understanding of Mongolia’s fauna. MICHAEL DUNBAR has studied pronghorn ecology, physiology and
veterinary aspects of animal health. BADAMJAV LKHAGVASUREN incorporates all aspects of biology into studies of Mongolia’s
mammals.