Electronic Scientific Paper Archive

Cinereous Vulture Nesting Ecology in Ikh Nartyn Chuluu Nature Reserve, Mongolia

Richard P. Reading1,2, Sukh Amgalanbaatar2,3, David Kenny1,2 and Banzarjav Dashdemberel4
1Denver Zoo, 2300 Steele St., Denver, CO 80205, e-mail: rreading@denverzoo.org
2Mongolian Conservation Coalition, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
3Institute of Biology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar 51, Mongolia
4National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

Abstract

Cinereous vultures (Aegypius monachus) are the largest raptors in Eurasia. Little is known about the species, especially in Mongolia. We studied the nesting ecology of cinereous vultures in Ikh Nartyn Chuluu Nature Reserve, Dornogobi Aimag. To assess reproductive success, we located active nests and periodically checked to determine if they remained active. We measured nest sizes and, periodically, nestling sizes and weights. We located 42 active cinereous vulture nests (27 on rocks and 15 on trees) in 2003 and 19 nests (14 on rocks and 5 on trees) in 2004. Mean volume of active nests was 3.92 ± 0.39 m3 (n = 36). Most nests failed prior to egg hatching, but after hatching nesting success rates increased dramatically. Following hatching, cinereous vulture chicks grew linearly until leveling off just prior to fledging. We generated growth curves for chicks that allowed us to determine the average size of chicks on specific dates. Improving the prospects for successful cinereous vulture conservation likely requires a better understanding of nesting ecology. As such, we plan to improve the quality of our data by monitoring nests more intensively to determine incubation and fledging lengths, as well as causes of nest failures.

Keyword: Aegypius monachus,Cinereous vulture,Gobi,Mongolia,nesting ecology

Introduction

Cinereous vultures (Aegypius monachus) are the largest raptors in Eurasia, sporting impressive 2.5 – 3 m wingspans and weighing 7 – 13 kg (Del Hoyo et al., 1992; Бlvarez & Garcйs, 1997). The species appears to be faring well in Mongolia, although internationally conservationists have expressed concern over the status of the species. Listed as Vulnerable in 1994 by the IUCN, the species was upgraded to Near Threatened in 2000, where it remains today despite continued population declines (IUCN, 2004). Little is known about the species in Mongolia, although a few research projects were recently initiated. For example, Korean researchers have studied the species in Ikh Gazariin Chuluu in Dundgobi Aimag, and researchers from Mongolia and USA have been studying the ecology of cinereous vultures in Hustai National Park and Erdenesant soum of Tov aimag since 2002 (Batbayar, 2004). Ikh Nartyn Chuluu Nature Reserve (Ikh Nart) in Dornogobi Aimag supports a large, dense (measured by total nests per unit area) breeding colony of cinereous vultures that usually includes >40 active nests/year in the northern 23,000 ha of the reserve. Vultures in Ikh Nart nest primarily on rocky outcrops and the scattered elm trees (Ulmus pumila) in the reserve. As with other vulture species in other areas of the world, nest site availability appears to constrain breeding cinereous vultures to areas with suitable nesting habitat; in this case, the more rugged areas like Ikh Nart (Sarа & Di Vittorio, 2003; Batbayar, 2004; Parra & Tellerнa, 2004). Nests on outcrops appear to be readily approachable by people and ground predators. In 2003 we initiated a research project to explore the nesting ecology of these large vultures in Ikh Nart. Our objectives were to compare nesting success rates of pairs using rocky outcrops with those using trees and to document growth rates of cinereous vulture nestlings.
Study Area
We conducted our research in the northern 23,000 ha of Ikh Nartyn Chuluun Nature Reserve. The reserve, located in northwestern Dornogobi Aimag was established in 1996 to protect 43,740 ha of rocky outcrops and associated wildlife in northwestern Dornogobi Aimag (Myagmarsuren, 2000). No permanent human settlements exist in or near the protected area (i.e. all towns > 30 km away), although nomadic pastoralists use the area seasonally for livestock grazing and maintain some permanent wintering structures (mostly stone corrals) in the reserve. The region is a high upland (~1,200 m) covered by semi-arid steppe vegetation. Permanent cold-water springs are available in some of the several shallow valleys draining the reserve. Climate is strongly continental and arid, characterized by cold winters (to - 40 °C), dry, windy springs (to 30 mps), and relatively wet (compared with the surrounding area) and hot summers (to 35 °C). Precipitation is low and seasonal, with most precipitation falling in the summer (late June – August). Flora and fauna are representative of the semi-arid regions of Central Asia, with a mix of desert and steppe species. Vegetation is sparse. Potential nesting trees for cinereous vultures and other birds are sparsely distributed along some of the drainages in the reserve. These trees are invariably elm trees. Xerophytic and hyperxerophytic semi-shrubs, shrubs, scrub vegetation, and turfy grasses dominate the reserve, although different plant communities can be found around oases and streams, on rocky outcrops, and other localized areas. Other globally significant wildlife species occurring in Ikh Nart include argalis (Ovis ammon), ibex (Capra sibirica), goitered gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa), Mongolian gazelles (Procapra gutturosa), lesser kestrels (Falco naumanni) and saker falcons (F. cherrug).

Material and Methods

To assess reproductive success, we located as many active nests as possible in the region, traversing the northern part of Ikh Nart on foot and in vehicles. Active nests were defined as nests with an egg or a chick (but see Steenhof, 1987). Where necessary we used binoculars, spotting scopes, or climbed into nests or onto adjacent rocks or tree limbs to confirm the presence of an active nest with an egg or chick. We collected location coordinates for all active nests using a global positioning system and noted the nesting substrate (i.e. tree or rock). Throughout the summer we periodically determined if nests remained active or not and collected data on nests and nestlings. We spent as little time as possible in the vicinity of nests to minimize disturbance (Steenhof, 1987). We measured nest sizes, including nest height, external diameter and internal diameter (diameter of the nest bowl), early in the nesting season. We used the nest height and external diameter to roughly determine nest volume (V = H * 2рr2, where V = volume, H = nest height, and r = external nest radius). We also periodically measured nestling size, including total body length (with and without feathers), wing lengths (with and without feathers), leg length (from the top of the femur to the tip of the middle toe), middle toe length, talon length, beak length, and weight. In late August and September 2004, we banded 5 nestlings with leg bands obtained from the Ornithology Laboratory of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences. We examined all variables for normality and homogeneity of group variance using Bartlett’s test. We used natural log, sine, and square root transformations or excluded outliers (n = 1-3) to normalize data where appropriate. We compared paired means using simple t-tests, with corrections for separate variances where appropriate. We used linear and log-linear regressions of body measurements against the number of days since June 1 to evaluate growth patterns of various vulture chick morphological measurements. Unless otherwise indicated, we present all means ± 1 S.E. We set significance at P < 0.05.

Result

We located a total of 42 active cinereous vulture nests (27 on rocks and 15 on trees) in 2003 and 19 active nests (14 on rocks and 5 on trees) in 2004. Cinereous vultures construct very large nests. In Ikh Nart, mean volume of active nests was 3.92 ± 0.39 m3 (n = 36). Mean dimensions were: height = 75.47 ± 4.49 cm and external diameter = 174.22 ± 4.63 cm. Nests in trees (4.30 ± 1.00 m3, n = 11) had larger volumes than nests on rocks (3.75 ± 0.36 m3, n = 25), but this difference was not significant (t12.7 = 0.52, P = 0.62). Nests on trees were slightly wider (174.73 ± 11.59 cm), but a little shorter (75.18 ± 9.28 cm) than nests on rocks (174.00 ± 4.60 cm and 75.60 ± 5.15 cm, respectively). These differences were not significant (t13.3 = 0.06, P = 0.70 and t16.5 = 0.04, P = 0.97, respectively). Most nests failed prior to egg hatching (Fig. 1).

In 2003, only 12 of 42 nests (28.6 %) retained fledglings by late July. After hatching (throughout May for most nests in Ikh Nart) nesting success rates increased dramatically. In 2004 we began monitoring nests in May, after the nesting began and eggs were laid. We found in total 19 nests, of which 12 (63.2 %) retained fledglings by late July. Most nests on rocky out-crops (78.6 %) lasted until late July in 2004, but tree nests still failed at a high rate (20.0 %). Similarly, in 2003 84.6 % of rock nests that survived until June retained fledglings by late July, but only 12.5 % of tree nests survived that long (Fig. 1). Following hatching, cinereous vulture chicks grew at a steady rate (i.e. linearly) that tended to level off just prior to fledging (Fig. 2). Combining data from 2003 and 2004 we were able to generate growth curves for chicks. These curves were highly significant for each of the morphological traits we measured (Table 1). Log-linear regressions did not improve curve fit (adjusted R2 values were all lower for log-linear regressions), and thus we only report the linear regressions here. Alternatively, using data only through September 1 did increase the R2 values substantially (Table 1). Using a September 1 cutoff date for our growth curves eliminates only 5-6 data points (n = 2 chicks) for each variable (Fig. 2). In addition, these 2 nests were located late in the year, so we cannot be sure they were not renesting attempts. Using the growth curves from our linear regressions on data through September 1 (Table 1, Fig. 2), we can determine the average size of cinereous vulture chicks on specific dates. For example, on average a vulture chick will weigh 7.6 kg on July 1, 9.2 kg on August 1, and 10.7 kg on September 1. He or she will also reach a total body length (with feathers) of 77.3 cm with a wing length (with feathers) of 82.3 cm and a girth of 50.9 cm by July 1. By September 1, right around fledging, the average chick will grow to 126.9 cm in length and 68.9 cm in girth, with a total wingspan (both wings) of 314.7 cm.

We located several nests only after eggs were laid and chicks hatched and due to personnel and time constraints, we did not monitor nests continuously from egg laying to hatching and to fledging. As a result, we could not determine the exact incubation and fledging periods for vultures.

Discussion

Improving the prospects for successful cinereous vulture conservation will likely require a better understanding of the nesting ecology of the species. Research in Spain and Greece found that human disturbance (measured by distance to human habitation or density of roads) negatively impacted nesting success of cinereous vultures (Fargallo et al., 1998; Donбzar et al., 1993; Poirazidis et al., 2004). Batbayar (2004) found cinereous vulture nests on relatively steep slopes in central Mongolia, but did not directly compare nest sites with the surrounding terrain. In Spain vultures preferred to nest in rugged habitat (Donбzar et al., 2002). Similarly, vultures in Greece preferred old, isolated trees on steeper slopes (Poirazidis et al., 2004). Egyptian vultures (Neophron percnopterus) and griffon vultures (Gyps fulvus) also appear to prefer nest sites far from humans and on rugged terrain (Sarа & Di Vittorio, 2003; Parra & Tellerнa, 2004). Competition for preferred nest sites can be intense, occasionally leading to aggressive encounters (Blanco et al., 1997). The densities of nesting pairs we found in Ikh Nart (~1.8 pairs/1,000 ha) is similar to the 1.3-2.9 pairs/1,000 ha reported for central Mongolia by Batbayar (2004) and the 1.7-2.0 pairs/1,000 ha reported for Uzbekistan (Del Hoyo et al., 1992), but far more than the 0.5 pair/1,000 ha reported for the Khentii Mountains of Mongolia (Del Hoyo et al., 1992). Del Hoyo et al. (1992) reports typical nest dimensions for cinereous vultures of 145 – 190 cm wide by 95 – 300 cm high. Batbayar (2004) reported mean nest surface dimensions of 168 ± 4.24 cm by 185 ± 4.90 cm and a mean nest height of 74 ± 3.62 cm. We found similar widths (mean = 174.22 ± 4.63 cm) and heights (mean = 75.47 ± 4.49 cm) to that found by Batbayar (2004), but smaller heights than those reported by Del Hoyo et al. (1992). We plan to continue our work to improve the quality of our data by monitoring vulture nests more intensively, but primarily from remote locations in the future. Gaps in our data necessitated that we assumed that all nests with nestlings hatched on the same day.


This assumption is obviously incorrect and likely accounts for much of the variation in nestling sizes we observed. In addition, some nests that contained chicks in late August and September likely represent re-nesting attempts of pairs that lost eggs (or perhaps even chicks) early in the breeding season, although they could simply result from late nesting pairs. However, Del Hoyo et al. (1992) report that cinereous vultures have incubation periods of 54 - 56 days and fledging periods of 104 - 120 days in Central Asia. Thus, eggs laid in late March could very well result in nestlings that fledge as late as late September. Nevertheless, we believe that the growth curves that exclude data past September 1 are more accurate (Table 1). Batbayar (2004) found higher rates of nesting success (43 - 73%) at 2 sites in Central Mongolia from 2002 – 2003 (59 % overall) than we found in our study (Fig. 1). Similar to our study (Fig 1), he found that most nest failures (70 %) occurred during incubation, as opposed to the nestling period (30 %) (Batbayar, 2004). Future research will also strive to determine the causes of nest failures. We are particularly interested in why tree nests appear to fail at higher rates than nests on rocky outcrops, especially since ground predators (e.g. wolves (Canis lupus); foxes (Vulpes spp.); Pallas’ cats (Otocolobus manul) should be able to access nests on rocks more easily. Trees may attract nomadic pastoralists with their herds in search of shade, increasing disturbance (D. Houston, pers. comm.). Aerial predators, especially northern ravens (Corvus corax) are common in Ikh Nart and likely contribute to nest failures, especially egg predation. We believe that heavy winds may be responsible for the loss of chicks in some tree nests as well. We also plan to band more fledglings to understand survivorship of fledglings, especially comparing the survivorship of cinereous vulture young. As we continue to obtain more detailed data on cinereous vulture nesting ecology, we hope to better understand the factors that influence nesting success. In turn, we hope these results will help us develop a better conservation management plan for the species in Mongolia.

Acknowledgement

Several people helped us to make this work possible, including Bat-Orshikh, Ts. Monkhzul, E. Togoldor, G. Tsogtjargal, G. Wingard, and several Earthwatch volunteers. Funding was provided by the Denver Zoological Foundation, Earthwatch Institute, the Trust for Mutual Understanding, the Mongolian Academy of Sciences, and the Argali Wildlife Research Center. Comments by Nyambayar Batbayar, David Houston, and Nigel Barton greatly strengthened the paper.

Reference

  1. Alvarez, E. & Garcйs, F. 1997. El buitre negro. Colecciуn GREA #4. Grupo para la Recuperaciуn de la Fauna Autуctona y su Hбbitat & Central Hispano. Madrid, Spain.
  2. Batbayar, N. 2004. Nesting ecology and breeding success of cinereous vultures (Aegypius monachus) in central Mongolia. M.S. Thesis. Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, USA.
  3. Blanco, G., Traverso, J.M., Marchamalo, J. & Martнnez, F. 1997. Interspecific and intraspecific aggression among griffon and cinereous vultures at nesting and foraging sites. J. Raptor Res. 31: 77-79.
  4. Del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., & Sargatal, J. 1992. Handbook of the birds of the world: New world vultures to guinea fowl. Vol. 2. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. 640 pp.
  5. Donazar, J.A., Hiraldo, F. & Bustamante, J. 1993. Factors influencing nest site selection, breeding density and breeding success in the bearded vulture (Gypaetus barbatus). J. Appl. Ecol. 30:504-514.
  6. Donбzar, J.A., Blanco, G., Hiraldo, F., Soto-Largo, E. & Oria, J. 2002. Effects of forestry and other land-use practices on the conservation of cinereous vultures. Ecol. Appl. 12: 1445-1456.
  7. Fargallo, J.A., Blanco, G. & Soto-Largo, E. 1998. Forest management effects on nesting habitat selected by Eurasian black vultures (Aegypius monachus) in central Spain. J. Raptor Res. 32: 202-207.
  8. IUCN. 2004. 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. www.redlist.org. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
  9. Mandakh, B., Wingard, G. & Reading, R. 2005. Winter pasture conditions and forage use by argali (Ovis ammon) in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park. Erforsch Biol. Ress. Mongolei, Halle (Saale) 9: 71-76.
  10. Myagmarsuren, D. (ed.). 2000. Special protected areas of Mongolia. Mongolian Environmental Protection Agency and GTZ (the German Technical Advisory Agency). Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
  11. Parra, J. & Tellerнa, J.L. 2004. The increase in the Spanish population of griffon vulture Gyps fulvus during 1989-1999: effects of food and nest site availability. Bird Conserv. Internat. 14: 33-41.
  12. Poirazidis, K., Goutner, V., Skartsi, T. & Stamou, G. 2004. Modelling nesting habitat as a conservation tool for the Eurasian black vulture (Aegypius monachus) in Dadia Nature Reserve, northeastern Greece. Biol. Conserv. 118: 235- 248.
  13. Sarа, M. & Di Vittorio, M. 2003. Factors influencing the distribution, abundance and nest-site selection of an endangered Egyptian vulture (Neophron percnopterus) population in Sicily. Animal Conserv. 6: 317-328.
  14. Steenhof, K. 1987.Assessing raptor reproductive success and productivity. In: Raptor Management Techniques Manual. (Ed. by B.G. Pendleton, B.A. Millsap, K.W. Cline & D.M. Bird). Pp 157-170. National Wildlife Federation, Washington D.C., National Wildlife Federation Scientific and Technical Series No. 10.